Compliance & Contracts

5

min read

Do Your Limits Actually Meet Your Largest Customer's Contract?

Park operators routinely require $5M–$25M in general liability and $10M+ umbrella from suppliers. Many suppliers carry less than their own contracts demand.

Share via:

a large ferris wheel at night

An Exposure That Is Both Uninsured and Unnoticed

If you manufacture, supply, install, or consult for the attractions industry, you have signed contracts with insurance requirements in them. Probably many of them. Probably several years ago.

Park operators impose insurance requirements on every supplier and vendor that enters their property or provides products for use on site. Those requirements are not modest. General liability limits of $5 million to $25 million are common, umbrella requirements of $10 million or more are routine, and the contracts typically specify particular additional insured endorsements naming the operator.

Here is the problem. Those requirements escalate over time as operators respond to their own severity environment. Supplier programs do not always escalate with them. The result is a supplier carrying limits that satisfied a contract signed in 2021 and fall short of the same customer's current requirements — without anyone noticing until a certificate is requested.

Why This Is Worse Than a Coverage Gap

An ordinary coverage gap costs you money if a claim happens. This one costs you money whether or not a claim happens.

You may be in breach. A contract that requires limits you do not carry is a contract you are not performing. Depending on the wording, that can be grounds for termination.

You may lose the work. Suppliers who cannot produce compliant certificates lose bids and lose renewals. Procurement departments do not litigate this; they select someone else.

You carry the difference personally. The gap between your limit and the contractual requirement is not covered by anyone. If a claim exceeds your limit and your contract obliged you to carry more, the shortfall is yours.

The Long-Tail Problem Underneath It

For manufacturers, this sits on top of a harder structural issue.

A ride designed and sold in 2005 may still be operating in 2035. Any injury across that entire operational life can generate a products liability claim against the original manufacturer. That is a thirty-year tail on a one-year policy.

Which makes policy continuity across years as important as the limit in any single year. A gap in coverage — a lapse between carriers, a period of reduced limits, a year with an exclusion that later years did not carry — leaves every product manufactured before that gap exposed. Long-tail classes are unforgiving about discontinuity in a way that short-tail classes are not.

What a Contract Audit Actually Involves

The exercise is straightforward and most suppliers have never done it:

  1. Pull your largest customer contracts — the top ten by revenue is usually enough to find the problem.

  2. Extract the insurance requirements from each: general liability limits, umbrella limits, required additional insured endorsements, primary and noncontributory wording, waiver of subrogation requirements, and any professional liability or cyber requirements.

  3. Compare against your current declarations pages, line by line.

  4. Map the gaps — where you are short, where the endorsement form you carry does not match the form the contract specifies, and where a requirement is not addressed at all.

  5. Check your history — how far back does continuous products and completed operations coverage extend, and are there gaps?

Terms Worth Knowing Before You Sign the Next One

Additional insured status is not automatic and the endorsement form matters. Confirm whether the form extends to both ongoing and completed operations — for a manufacturer, the completed operations piece is the one that counts.

Primary and noncontributory wording requires your policy to pay first without seeking contribution from the operator's own program. Without it, an additional insured endorsement may share the loss rather than transfer it.

Waiver of subrogation prevents your insurer from later recovering against a party you agreed to protect. It has to be arranged in advance, not discovered after a claim.

Certificates of insurance confer no rights by themselves. They evidence coverage; they do not create it. A certificate that says you carry something you do not carry is a problem waiting to happen.

Questions to Take Into Your Next Renewal

  • Do our current limits satisfy the requirements in our ten largest customer contracts?

  • Does our additional insured endorsement extend to completed operations, or only ongoing operations?

  • Is our coverage primary and noncontributory where our contracts require it?

  • How far back does our continuous products and completed operations coverage extend, and are there any gaps?

  • How old is the oldest product we manufactured that is still in active service?

The Bottom Line

Most suppliers who run this audit find something. Usually it is a limit that has not kept pace with a customer's escalating requirements, occasionally it is an endorsement form mismatch, and sometimes it is a gap in the historical record that matters more than either.

All of it is fixable. None of it is fixable after a certificate request has already been declined.

FAQs About Contractual Insurance Requirements

How often do operator insurance requirements change?
Frequently enough to matter. Operators revise requirements as their own severity environment shifts, and the revised terms usually appear in the next contract renewal rather than being flagged separately.

Does an additional insured endorsement cover completed operations?
Not always. Some forms cover ongoing operations only. For manufacturers and installers, the completed operations extension is the critical piece.

What happens if we cannot meet a customer's requirements?
Usually you lose the work. Occasionally a customer will accept a lower limit with a written waiver, but that is the exception and it should be documented.

Why does policy continuity matter so much for manufacturers?
Because products liability is long-tail. A gap in coverage exposes every product manufactured before it, regardless of how well the current year is covered.

Who should perform a contract audit?
Your broker, but only one who will actually read the contracts rather than the certificate requests. The requirements live in the agreement, not the certificate.

IAAPA Insurance Solutions offers a coverage adequacy and contract audit as a standard part of onboarding for manufacturer, supplier, and consultant members. Most members who run it find a gap.

More resources